MAGNETIC MOMENTS, Number 8
(originally printed in Speleonics 11, Nov 1988, p6)
|H(noise) =||-27.9 -10log f -15log A +10log K -10log Q +10log B + Nt + Fv|
|(dB rel. 1 microamp/m)|
where: f =
|A =||area of loop (m2)|
|K =||induction factor (fig. 1)|
|Q =||antenna Q factor|
|B =||receiver bandwidth (Hz)|
|Nt =||transformer degredation factor (dB)|
|Fv =||Receiver noise factor (dB)|
The noise field of the antenna can be compared to the atmospheric noise field to determine which is predominant. For small loops sometimes antenna noise can in fact exceed the atmospheric noise. Thus a larger (and thermally quieter) antenna could improve system performance. Once the optimum size is reached, however, no increase in the receiver system performance will result simply from a larger antenna; that is, the signal-to-noise ratio at the receiver input will not be increased by a larger antenna.
For example the noise field of the small ASS cave radio antenna can be compared to the atmospheric noise found in Alberta.
|f =||115400 Hz||-10log f =||-50.6|
|A =||0.5 m2||-15log A =||+ 4.5|
|K =||2.8||+10log K =||+ 4.5|
|Q =||80||-10log Q =||-19.0|
|B =||1500 Hz||+10log B =||+31.8|
|Nt =||4 dB||(assumption)||+ 4.0|
|Fv =||3 dB||(assumption)||+ 3.0|
(rel 1 microamp/metre)
In Magnetic Moments #7 the noise field strength at 115.4 kHz in a bandwidth of 1500 Hz, on a summer afternoon in Alberta, was derived as -39 dB(1microA/m). Thus under these conditions the antenna noise field is 10 dB below the atmospheric noise and (quite by accident) the receiving antenna would seem to be about the optimum size! In fact Alberta can be significantly quieter at other times and a larger receiving antenna can be beneficial in extending range under these circumstances of lower atmospheric noise.
Copyright © 2000 Communications & Electronics Section of the NSS, Inc. - All Rights Reserved.